Mom Blogging for Dummies Part 3: Blogging Ethics



Before purchasing and reading Mom Blogging for Dummies  I had assumed that Chapter 9 “Mastering Blogging Ethics” was going to be the main point of interest for me based off the title alone. To be fair, it was a great chapter and I found it very informative it just didn’t cover any of the topics I had expected. For a brief review of the entire book see “Mom Blogging forDummies Part 1: A review”.
                What Chapter nine did include was some very practical advice on both legality and integrity when working with other brands, sponsors, or companies. The best part of “Mastering Blogging Ethics” was Piersall’s informative break down of FTC guidelines as they apply to blogging. She also walks us through editorial policies, disclosure policies, privacy policies (regarding the collection/use of reader information), conducting lawful giveaways and contests, truthful product reviews, and tax laws that pertain to blog income. I repeat; Great. Informative. Chapter. However, there’s so much more that could be talked about outside of this mainly legal ethical angle on blogging.
Piersall is very clear on the consequences of not knowing or abiding by her advice in this section, stating that:
… unless you understand the rules about writing compensated blog posts, you risk getting fined thousands of dollars by the FTC, getting dropped from Google’s search engine results, and ruining your reputation, thereby ruining your blogging business (ch 9, pg 1).
But what about the potential consequences of utilizing personal information about your family and others’ experiences to make a profit?

                In the article “Interactivity and Prioritizing the Human: A Code of Blogging Ethics” author Martin Kuhn composes and advocates for an ethical blogging code usable by all blog genres (he mentions previous attempts that were only applicable to journalistic blogs). In order to do this, Kuhn first determines the core values of blogging by compiling research from new communication technology scholarship, like that of David Gunkel and Debra Hawhee among others, with a survey of bloggers themselves.
                Khun’s research culminated in the following code, which he proposes as a starting point in the discussion on blogging and ethics:
Promote Interactivity: Post to your blog on a regular basis. Visit and post on other blogs. Respect blog etiquette. Attempt to be entertaining, interesting, and/or relevant.
Promote Free Expression: Do not restrict access to your blog by specific individuals or groups. Do not self-censor by removing posts or comments once they are published. Allow and encourage comments on your blog.
Strive for Factual Truth: Never intentionally deceive others. Be accountable for what you post.
Be as Transparent as Possible: Reveal your identity as much as possible (name, photo, background info, etc.). Reveal your personal affiliations and conflicts of interest. Cite and link to all sources referenced in each post.
Promote the “Human” Element in Blogging: Minimize harm to others when posting information. Promote community by linking to other blogs and keeping a blogroll. Build relationships by responding to e-mails and comments regularly.
(Kuhn, 33-34)
                It’s interesting to see how this code compares to Piersall’s “Mastering Blogging Ethics” chapter. Her focus seems to coincide with the principles of striving for factual truth and being as transparent as possible but is lacking in those having to do with accountability such as “minimize harm to others when posting information” (Khun, 34).
                Another point of interest came from one of the questions in Khun’s survey, “who are the ‘stakeholders’ with regard to your blog? Who will be affected by what you post?” (Khun, 28). Khun found that “the primary response …indicated that bloggers see themselves as the primary and in some cases sole stakeholder” (Khun, 28). Only six bloggers mentioned people they know in real life and only four mentioned people who are the subject of blog entries as potential stakeholders (Khun, 28). Khun states that his study was limited by the number of participants, so it’s difficult to say whether this sample is actually indicative of bloggers in general. But if bloggers are primarily concerned with their own interests, like reaching success and making a profit, I can see why the trade-off of privacy (whether their own or their family’s) in exchange for popularity could be enticing.

Source:
Martin Kuhn (2007) Interactivity and Prioritizing the Human: A Code of Blogging Ethics , Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22:1, 18-36, DOI: 10.1080/08900520701315244

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What have we learned about blogging, Facebook, and Cambridge Analytica

Image
Concerns have been raised this past week by experts  about the amount of information being collected and dispersed by a few giant internet companies  after widespread reports  that U. K. - based Cambridge Analytica used data from more than 50 million Facebook accounts to influence the 2016 USA presidential election.   Folks are also starting to wonder how secure their personal information is on social media networks. News reports  claim that it increasingly depends on where people live and access the web on the planet. Keeping ones privacy online is no longer - and may never have been -  easy, if at all possible.  While there are articles that provide users with advice and guidelines on how to use the internet in ways that protect the personal privacy of users , many people still give away personal information about themselves and often about their children through their blogs and online posts.  At this time of being se...
Read more

I Believe Introductions are in Order : Claire

My name is Claire Renic and I’m a second year WGS/rhetoric student at the University of Winnipeg, with plans to continue my higher education in women’s studies, with a focus on sexology. Being born in the nineties means I am a child of the internet; my generation has grown up connected, and this sense of connection shows no sign of slowing down. My relationship with social media and screen is one of the longest term relationships I have to date. For as long as I can remember I’ve been interested in screen, which resulted in both parents implementing restrictions on the amount of “screen time” both my sister and I took in daily. In all honesty, I can probably count on one hand how many days those rules were abided by… but the battle over screen went on for years. When my sister and I first got cell phones, they had to be turned off and put downstairs for the night.... again, you can imagine how long that lasted.  Some of the earliest memories I have of sc...
Read more

moving to the question of privacy and online practices

Image
https://www.playmeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/0111_group-compass-walk_div-1024x902.png What's the right word to describe voluntarily surrendering personal and private information that could be used about or against one? The rather old fashioned word wiretapping continues to be used against 3rd party interventions -- when 3rd parties tap into phone or internet conversations to gain privileged information. Donald Trump has raised the specter of wiretapping as something done to him although his allegations are often unfounded,  floundering and meeting with denial. Would a word like "open line" best describe the willingness of ordinary citizens to expose their private conversations and information to the online world listening in.  Online users who are interested have learned that privacy settings offer limited protection of one's privacy. I might find my picture advertising a product that I have not endorsed or given permission to be used in this manner. Y...
Read more