Beth on the Virani article....
Beth on the Virani article that cautions about Facebook and privacy loss:
I have been on the fence about getting rid of Facebook for quite some
time, and like Clare after reading this article am closer than ever.
Concerns
with Facebook’s privacy regulations have been ongoing but I remember distinctly
when the big scare that Salim Virani addresses swept social media. I was always
suspicious of Facebook's privacy settings and how effective they might be, but
assumed that because I don't use my real name, my profile is linked to an old Hotmail account rather than my current email, and I don't have the Facebook app
on my phone, that my information was safe. This clearly isn’t the case,
and it now seems naïve and blindly optimistic to assume that our personal
information won’t be mined for corporate gain, which happens constantly online
from the use of cookies to participation on various social media platforms.
When
Facebook first got called out for sneakily altering their privacy settings a series
of copy and paste disclaimers proclaiming the users autonomy and right to
privacy went viral. The irony of people making a statement against a social
media platform using that very platform didn’t go unnoticed, but more
importantly proved how little control we have when operating within systems
such as Facebook. The brilliance of the social media companies is that they
instil the sense that their “tools” exist to benefit the user, and that they
are simply a benevolent provider. This type of branding can be seen across the
internet and it is probably time we accepted the fact that anything offered for
“free” online is making bank by taking our information, which is worth far more
than a few measly dollars.
A
friend of mine recently noticed a photo of hers being used for a Vice article.
Vice didn’t ask permission, or even notify her, which they should have done to
maintain any sense of integrity as a publication. But as we all (should) know
any images uploaded to Facebook are public domain and can be used as such. In
the end she harangued the journalist who used her photo and they credited her,
but she didn’t receive a usage fee, and felt pretty strange about not being
asked permission.
Comments
Post a Comment